THE LEFT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE MISCHIEF THAT THEY ARE ACCUSING THE CONGRESS OF.

The tragedy that is eluding many of us is that:

1. The economy is in a doldrums solely because of the backseat driving by the irresponsible Left and the opportunistic Congress allowing itself to be willingly blackmailed.

2. The Left's anti-US, anti-Israel and pro-Iran stand is what they hope will please their Muslim vote bank. CITU's M.K.Pandhe had let out the cat from the bag when he said so in so many words a few days ago after which the refrain was taken up by another Muslim appeaser Mayavati.

3. With almost all Parties badly wanting the sobriquet of “Secular” which in India is the synonym for “Appeaser”, the Muslim vote if at all it operates as a monolith is bound to get fragmented with so many suitors out to placate them. The myth of “Secularism” was exploded by the BJP when Advani’s Ram Rath hit the road to put together its Hindu Unity agenda by leaving all the other pseudo-secular political parties to run after the so-called consolidated Muslim vote. But in India running after the Hindu vote as compared to running after the Muslim vote is unacceptable to the Left leaning media as well as the intelligentsia as any effort to unite the fragmented Hindus is dubbed “communal” whereas wooing the myth of an existing unified Muslim opinion is “secular” which requires no efforts to create it. The assumed Muslim unity is deemed to be a virtue but any effort to transmit this virtue to Hindus is a vice. So large is the space occupied in the Indian polity by this counterfeit thesis that today it has even made the BJP jittery as to what political line it should adopt not only for garnering a slice of the Muslim vote but possibly overhaul its media fashioned illiberal image for greater acceptance among the disjointed Hindus themselves.

4. The Communists are against the nuclear deal because it will harm China's interests vis-à-vis a resurgent India which is the last thing that these traitors want. One may ask why should an Indian political party volunteer to become a stooge of a foreign power. The answer possibly lies in the reality that they were never ever a pan Indian entity but managed to thrive parasitically by owing allegiance to the erstwhile Soviet Union that could and would regularly exert its agendas on India to keep it in its own orbit and outside the American one in the name of nonalignment. It was easily achieved then with crypto-Communists like Nehru and his ilk calling the shots. With the dismantling of the USSR the freed space was sought to be occupied by China whose superior might the Communists want us to meekly accept so that they may continue to occupy a disproportionately larger power wielding intellectual space than their actual numbers or relevance in India could ever justify.

5. Even though they are unabashed admirers of a resurgent China’s market driven economy, the Indian Communists do not wish us to pursue the same successful formula as it would make us China’s rival in the global power stakes. Any discounting of China’s influence within India and a possible western lean would mean even a faster rate of disappearance of the Left’s presence in India. A nightmare that they would want to avoid at any price.

6. They have invoked Nehru's effete foreign policies because it helped China by turning India into a soft State against all its enemies including Islamic Pakistan and Bangladesh.

7. For the Congress their chickens are now coming home to roost. No sympathies from any quarter are due to them. After all it is the Congress dominated UPA that has for the first time in history made the anti-India Communists the power behind the throne for over four years at the Centre.